Legal Opinion

Kirt v. Oaklawn Sugar Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1989No. CA 88 1598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIN, Judge.

This is an appeal of a judgment finding that the plaintiffs medical condition was not work related and therefore not covered by workers compensation.

FACTS

On September 21, 1984, Kenneth Kirt alleges that he was injured while pulling a rope to raise a shaft. He was employed by Oaklawn Sugar Company and the accident was in the course and scope of his employment. The plaintiff saw Dr. Degeyter, an internist, on Friday, September 28, 1984, at the suggestion of his employer. Dr. De-geyter treated him with medication for pain and inflammation. Dr. Degeyter told the plaintiff to refrain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Tucker v. Associated Grocers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Menendez v. Continental Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirt v. Oaklawn Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API