Legal Opinion

Curtis Lee Jones v. Dr. George J. Beto

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1972No. 71-1429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

By order of September 22, 1971, a panel of this court remanded this habeas corpus petition to the district court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. F.R.Civ.P., Rule 52(a). 1 The district court has complied with our order and without ordering an evidentiary hearing entered findings of fact and conclusions of law which reaffirm its action of denying appellant relief. In substance, the district court found that appellant was serving a life sentence for murder and that all of his claimed grounds for habeas corpus relief, save two, had been adversely determined in three prior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Richard Gerzin v. Dr. George J. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Curtis Lee Jones v. Dr. George J. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Procuro Flores, Individually and as Next Friend of Benjamin Reyes, a Minor v. Employers' Fire Insurance Company of San Antonio, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Stephon WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API