Commonwealth v. Hay
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ABRAMSON, Judge.
The Commonwealth appeals from a pretrial order dismissing three counts of an indictment, based on the trial judge’s conclusion that the Commonwealth would be unable to prove an essential element of the offenses at trial. The three counts charged Appellees Lucian Hunter Hay and Adele Hay jointly with theft by failure to make required disposition of property over $300 during 1992, 1993 and 1994. Having reviewed the arguments of the parties and the applicable law, we reverse and remand.
The three counts at issue in this appeal originally were Counts XX, XXI and XXII of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. FoleyKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. FieldsKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PerryKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003