Legal Opinion

Gore v. South Carolina Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7420DC183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in concluding that Michael Gore was protected under the garage liability policy. Applicable coverage provisions of the policy included the following:

“Automobile Hazards:

1. All Automobiles:(a) The ownership, maintenance or use of any automobile for the purpose of garage operations, and the occasional use for other business purposes and the use for non-business purposes of any automobile owned by or in charge of the named insured and used principally in garage operations. . . .

❖ ❖ ❖

Persons Insured: Each of the following is an insured under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Brinkley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Shearin v. Globe Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Burr v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moser v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API