Legal Opinion

Hammons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1953No. A-11747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

The plaintiff in error Herchel Hammons, defendant below, was charged with the crime of knowingly receiving stolen property, Title 21, § 1713, O. S. A. 1941, to wit, one roan calf about 6 days old, the property of Mrs. H. B. Arterberry. The information alleged the crime to have been committed in Grady county, Oklahoma, on or about April 14, 1.951, on the defendant’s farm near Pocasset, Oklahoma. The defendant was tried by a jury, convicted, his punishment fixed by the trial judge at 1 year and 1 day in the penitentiary and judgment and sentence entered accordingly, from which this appeal has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Pressley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Corliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Blumhoff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API