Legal Opinion
Fiorillo v. Central Insurance Co. of Baltimore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCbapser, J.
The above actions were brought to recover the sum of $1,060.69 on three separate policies of fire insurance.
The defendants admitted the issuance of the policies of insurance and that a fire occurred in the premises on June 7, 1941, and in substance denied the remaining allegations in the complaint and set up separate defenses of fraud in the filing of the proof of loss and the second defense that the plaintiff violated the provisions of the policies in that he permitted or kept petroleum products in the premises which were not usual or incidental to the occupancy. The actions were tried…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slocovich v. Orient Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Porter v. . Traders' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- O'Connell v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- O'Connell v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Perretta v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance v. PassalacquaNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Rosen v. Colonial Cooperative InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966