Legal Opinion

Bautisa v. TAP Air Portugal

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 28, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00503Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAVIER BAUTISTA, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-00503 (JLR) -against- MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TAP AIR PORTUGAL, Defendant. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Javier Bautista (“Plaintiff”), pro se, moves this Court to reopen his case, which the Court previously dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, and remand it to small claims court. Dkt. 25; see Dkt. 22. Defendant TAP Air Portugal (“Defendant” or “TAP”) opposes the motion. Dkt. 29. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API