Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sheldon v. Grand River Dam Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1938No. 28318Published

1DissentCorn, J.

In support of the contention that the Act of 1935, as amended by the Act of 1937, is a general law, although it creates a conservation and reclamation district limited to a particular part of the state, and in a manner different from that provided by the general statute relating to the creation of conservation and reclamation districts, and with powers, rights, and privileges limited to property and persons within a designated area of the state, the majority opinion relies on the decisions of this court which have upheld the validity of acts establishing superior courts in various counties of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Budd v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. Webb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API