Wendt v. Lentz

On behalf of the defendant it is conceded, and we think advisedly, that it is not necessary in order to maintain an action for seduction that pregnancy or venereal disease should have resulted from the intercourse. The following cases are cited as having a bearing upon this question: Klopfer v. Bromme, 26 Wis. 372; Stewart v. Smith, 92 Wis. 76, 78, 65 N. W. 736; Knight v. Wilcox, 14 N. Y. 413; Jex v. Straus, 122 N. Y. 293, 301, 25 N. E. 478; Ingerson v. Miller, 47 Barb. 50, 51; Abrahams v. Kidney, 104 Mass. 222; Blaggs v. Ilsley, 127 Mass. 191. From a consideration of these authorities it…