Legal Opinion

Swartout v. Grover Collins Drilling Mud Engineers & Materials

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1959No. 4153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Appellant has appealed from judgment in favor of the respective respondents in varying amounts for supplies, material, and well-drilling services. The only contention raised by appellant is that the evidence discloses that he contracted the obligations as agent for Bonanza Oil Company, a corporation, and not as a principal; that such fact was disclosed by the evidence of respondents themselves and that the court erred in the first instance in denying the motion made by appellant at the conclusion of respondents’ case for an order of involuntary dismissal, and, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Shipping Bd. Merchant Fleet Corporation v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  3. Siler v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ralph Rogers & Company, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Cumberland Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Currie v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  2. Sealy v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Chisholm v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Berman v. Riverside Casino CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1964
  5. Matter of Twin Lakes Village, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API