Legal Opinion
Law v. Siegel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2009No. Nos. 07-55200, 07-55203Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Stephen Law, Chapter 7 debtor, and Lili Lin, a citizen of China and purported lien holder, appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving a compromise agreement that allows the trustee to recover a fraudulent trust deed for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. Alfred H. Siegel, the bankruptcy trustee, cross appeals from the BAP’s decision reversing the bankruptcy court’s order granting the trustee’s surcharge motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision. Arrow…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re P.R.T.C., Inc., Debtor. Duckor Spradling & Metzger v. Baum TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Kaypro, Debtor. Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Howard Justus, Trustee, in Re Kaypro, Debtor. Arrow Electronics, Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Schweber Electronics, Inc. v. Howard Justus, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Latman v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Lester C. Blair, Bankrupt. Port O'Call Investment Co. v. Lester C. Blair, by and Through Richard A. Peterson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Onubah v. Zamora (In Re Onubah)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007