Reynolds v. Garber-Buick Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Assumpsit by Walter Reynolds against the GarberBuick Company for the recovery back of money paid to the defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
Plaintiff, a young man residing in a rural neighborhood in the township of Dover, in Clare county, brought this action in Saginaw county, against defendant, a corporation located and dealing in automobiles in the city of Saginaw, for the purpose of recovering from the latter $300 paid it for a Ford automobile and $75 later paid as the difference in exchanging said Ford for a Buick runabout. The contracts of purchase and exchange for these cars were made and money paid during plaintiff’s minority. On coming of age he disaffirmed the contracts, returned the Buick car, and demanded refund of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitcomb v. JoslynSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878
3Cited by13 opinions
- I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Woodman v. Kera LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Campbell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Semmens v. Floyd Rice Ford, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Utterstrom v. Myron D. Kidder, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.