Legal Opinion
City of Melrose v. Klasen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1986No. C1-86-618Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
The City of Melrose seeks review of a determination that the respondent, Richard Klasen, is entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits for a period of disciplinary suspension from work. We affirm.
*734FACTS
Richard Klasen was employed by the City of Melrose for many years. On September 10, 1985, Klasen and a co-worker were scheduled to attend an all-day seminar in Lester Prairie, Minnesota, and were given a city-owned automobile for traveling to and from the seminar. After attending the morning session of the seminar, Klasen and his co-worker took a lunch break at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seacrist v. City of Cottage GroveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Jansen v. PEOPLES ELEC. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Economic Security v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & RehabilitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.