Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1992No. 6-91-057-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Rogelio Martinez was convicted of delivery of cocaine. Punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, was set at fifty years’ confinement and a $2,000.00 fine.

On appeal Martinez raises only one point, asserting that improper jury argument by the prosecutor requires reversal and a new trial. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.

In final argument at the guilt/innocence stage of the trial, the prosecutor made the following comments:

[MR. BUCHANAN:] The cops are out there every day putting their lives on the line.

MR. REYES: Outside the record.

THE COURT:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Decker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. Chatman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Torres, Rolando v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API