Martinez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Rogelio Martinez was convicted of delivery of cocaine. Punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, was set at fifty years’ confinement and a $2,000.00 fine.
On appeal Martinez raises only one point, asserting that improper jury argument by the prosecutor requires reversal and a new trial. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.
In final argument at the guilt/innocence stage of the trial, the prosecutor made the following comments:
[MR. BUCHANAN:] The cops are out there every day putting their lives on the line.
MR. REYES: Outside the record.
THE COURT:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Decker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Chatman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Torres, Rolando v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002