Legal Opinion

Gendler v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1935No. 30,604PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff sued' defendant for slander and also in a separate action sued it for assault. The two actions were consolidated for trial. Defendant consented thereto, but insisted on a separate verdict in each action. Plaintiff’s attorney stated that it was not necessary to decide at the beginning of the trial whether there should be two verdicts or one. In the charge the court directed the jury to return one verdict only, and in case the verdict was for plaintiff to designate therein the amount of the general damages and the amount of the “special damages” found. The jury returned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. HeglandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. SchlonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Callahan v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Mosiman v. RapaczSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API