Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Cozza

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 14, 1972No. Nos. 191-3; 202-3Published

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.

Defendant Gus J. Cozza appeals: (1) a judgment enforcing a promissory note in plaintiff James J. Palmer’s favor, and (2) the trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial after remand from this court in Palmer v. Cozza, 2 Wn. App. 900, 471 P.2d 102 (1970).

Upon conflicting evidence, presented entirely by the tes*575timony (and accompanying exhibits) of the two individual parties, the trial court found defendant had drawn a note in plaintiff’s favor for $4,500, failed to honor same and was therefore liable to plaintiff for the face amount of the note, plus 7 per cent per annum interest from November…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. FelsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. Libbee v. HandyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Palmer v. CozzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API