Facchini v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERRI FACCHINI, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:22-cv-1621 (JAM) RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS This is an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),
15 U.S.C. § 1692
et seq. The plaintiff primarily claims that the defendants violated the Act by sending her a debt collection letter that set forth contradictory dates for her to dispute the validity of a debt. I conclude that the plaintiff has failed to show that she has standing and she has also failed to state plausible grounds…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Brownback v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.