Legal Opinion

Facchini v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 28, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01621Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERRI FACCHINI, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:22-cv-1621 (JAM) RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS This is an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq. The plaintiff primarily claims that the defendants violated the Act by sending her a debt collection letter that set forth contradictory dates for her to dispute the validity of a debt. I conclude that the plaintiff has failed to show that she has standing and she has also failed to state plausible grounds…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Brownback v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API