Boltri v. Singletary
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Because petitioner has not demonstrated that the circuit court failed to afford him due process of law or departed from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition. See Sheley v. State, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).
The proper remedy to correct a sentencing error is with the sentencing court, not a petition for writ of mandamus against the Florida Parole Commission and Department of Corrections. See Boyd v. State, 538 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farhangi v. Dunkin DonutsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999