Legal Opinion

Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 12, 2026No. 3:18-cv-00939Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CYNTEC COMPANY, LTD., Case No. 18-cv-00939-TLT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 9 v. GRANTING IN PART CYNTEC'S MOTION REQUESTING JUDICIAL 10 CHILISIN ELECTRONICS CORP., et al., NOTICE; DENYING CHILISIN’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 11 Defendants. AS MOOT 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 452, 471 13 14 Pending before the Court are Cyntec’s motion requesting judicial notice and Chilisin’s 15 conditional cross-motion for judicial notice. See ECF 452; ECF 471. Having carefully considered 16 the parties’ briefs, the relevant case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Pinterest Inc. v. Pintrips Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Williams v. RickardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API