Legal Opinion

In Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - Mdl 1869

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 15, 2021No. Misc. No. 2007-0489Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ) ANTITRUST LITIGATION ) ) MDL Docket No. 1869 ) Miscellaneous No. 07-0489 (PLF) This document relates to: ) ) ALL DIRECT PURCHASER CASES ) __________________________________________) OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1049 (PLF) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) OPINION Defendants in Rail Freight MDL No. 1869 and defendants in Oxbow move pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) to certify this…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API