Legal Opinion

Hassebroch v. Weaver Construction Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1954No. 48614PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

We observe at the outset that appellant’s opening brief disregards rule 344, Rules of Civil Procedure, in that it contains no statement of the case, the facts, or errors relied on for reversal. The argument contains only three references to the record — two to testimony of one witness, the other to the trial court’s judgment. The volume and page in the Iowa Reports are not given for some of the cases cited, as required by rule 344(e). A reasonable effort should have been made to comply with rule 344.

The controversy before the deputy industrial commissioner as sole arbitrator and the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Rozmajzl v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Norton v. Day Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Meyer v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. Bethards v. Shivvers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Stewart v. HiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Olson v. Goodyear Service StoresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API