Randall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for murder with malice. The punishment was assessed by a jury at life.
Appellant’s contention is that the trial court erred in admitting his written statement into evidence.
The record reflects that after appellant was arrested and placed in a police car, he stated to Officer Johnson, of the Dallas Police Department, that “he had killed her (the deceased).” Thereafter, at the police station, he was warned of his rights pursuant to Art. 38.22 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. He then made the statement that was admitted.
The court conducted a pre-trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vaughns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Randall v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1973
- Tremain Tunstall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998