Roby v. Hawthorne
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JO'NES, Chief Justice.
Charles Roby, appellant, instituted this suit in a district court of Dallas county, to recover damages from R. O. Hawthorne, appel-lee, for diverting surface water from its natural flow, and causing same to flow across appellant’s land. From an adverse judgment, based on the findings of a jury, appellant has prosecuted this appeal. The following are the necessary facts:
What is known as the Combine road, a public thoroughfare, extends north and south through the western edge of the town of Seagoville, in Dallas county. Appellant’s land, consisting of 76.8 acres, borders…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Walenta v. WolterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Hester v. McAdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Universal Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Bevers v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roby v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Jones v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Benavides v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Lakeside Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. BelangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Arturo Contreras v. James Robert Bennett and Hilda M. Bennett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.