Legal Opinion

Roby v. Hawthorne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1934No. 11485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JO'NES, Chief Justice.

Charles Roby, appellant, instituted this suit in a district court of Dallas county, to recover damages from R. O. Hawthorne, appel-lee, for diverting surface water from its natural flow, and causing same to flow across appellant’s land. From an adverse judgment, based on the findings of a jury, appellant has prosecuted this appeal. The following are the necessary facts:

What is known as the Combine road, a public thoroughfare, extends north and south through the western edge of the town of Seagoville, in Dallas county. Appellant’s land, consisting of 76.8 acres, borders…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Walenta v. WolterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Hester v. McAdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Universal Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Bevers v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roby v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Jones v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Benavides v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Lakeside Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. BelangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Arturo Contreras v. James Robert Bennett and Hilda M. Bennett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API