Legal Opinion
Marland v. Ambach
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (79 AD2d 48).
We would only add that because there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the factual determination that petitioner’s retirement was involuntary, the issue is beyond our power to review. (CPLR 5501, subd [b]; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 108, pp 452-455; see, also, Schubtex, Inc. v Allen…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ricca v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Marland v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gould v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Winston v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Girard v. Board of Education of City School District of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Arbitration between Mangee & MamorellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gould v. Board of Education of the Sewanhaka Central High School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.