In Re the Welfare of J.L.L.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The parental rights of both J.L.L.’s parents were terminated by a court order dated February 2, 1986. The father appeals, arguing that the evidence does not mandate termination. He contends that the trial court erred in relying on evidence of past abuse and failed to cite evidence of on-going abuse of the child by appellant at the time of the hearing; that the evidence does not support a finding that his present inability to assume complete parental responsibility will continue for a prolonged or indefinite period; and that reasonable efforts, under the direction of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- National Wildlife Federation v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re the Welfare of J.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of Welfare of MaasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014