Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Campbell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 1, 2006No. 4D04-4920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

920 So.2d 1264 (2006)

Clivens GOLDMAN, Appellant,

v.

Rose G. CAMPBELL, Appellee.

No. 4D04-4920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 1, 2006.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Ginsberg & Schwartz, Miami, and Nicole S. Freedlander of Nelson & Freedlander, Miami, for appellant.

Richard A. Sherman of the Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, Fort Lauderdale, and Samuel Tyler Hill of Hill & Lemongello, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

TAYLOR, J.

Clivens Goldman, the plaintiff below, timely appeals the denial of his motion for attorney's fees and costs. His motion for fees and costs was filed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Puryear v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Mourning v. Ballast Nedam Const., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Easters v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Trace Elements, Inc. v. Nadja MacKensenSupreme Court of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API