Legal Opinion
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNA
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 4, 2016No. Civ. No. 15-661-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SUE L. ROBINSON, United States District Judge
At Wilmington this 4th day of February, 2016, having reviewed the papers filed in connection with the pending motions, and having heard oral argument on the same, the court issues its decision based on the reasoning that follows:
1. Background. Plaintiff DNA Genotek Inc. (“DNAG”) is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business in Ka-nata, Ontario. DNAG is a wholly-owned subsidiary of OraSure Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Defendants Spectrum DNA,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adtile Technologies Inc. v. Perion Network Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum DNADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Hedger v. Medline Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Mabey v. Crystalite Bohemia, S.R.O.Superior Court of Delaware · 2018