Legal Opinion

Clay v. Metropolitan Government

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2002No. 02-5025PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ambrose W.J. Clay and J.T. Wither-spoon, Tennessee residents proceeding pro se, appeal the district court order dismissing their civil action. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Seeking ten million dollars in damages and class action status, Clay and Wither-spoon sued the “Metropolitan Government and the Codes Administration of Said Government of Tennessee.” They alleged that the defendants denied Clay his Seventh…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Thomas L. Apple v. John Glenn, U.S. SenatorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Russell S. Duncan v. Rolm Mil-Spec Computers and Loral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. GTFM, LLC. v. TKN Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boileau v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  2. Lusk v. LaminDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Shehan v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Stephens v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API