Legal Opinion

In Re Rosin

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 23, 2008No. 10-08-00087-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISSENT TO REQUEST FOR A RESPONSE

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

This proceeding, as a mandamus proceeding, suffers from a number of problems, including service on the parties and persons who will be directly affected by the Court’s judgment, the availability of a number of remedies by direct appeal or other method of review to attack the validity of the “order,” as well as the fact that what is denominated as an “order” may be nothing more than the “notice” required by the statute. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 501.014(e)(4) (Vernon 2004).

I would deny the petition.

But if I was going to request a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Keeling, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  2. In Re Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  2. Hernando Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  3. Hernando Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  4. William Carroll Marrow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  5. in Re Richard D. Rosin, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API