Legal Opinion

National Union Bank v. Reed

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 2, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by the National Union Bank of Dover, N. J., against Marvin T. Reed individually, and as surviving partner of the firm of McFadden & Reed, and Leonard S. Howard. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered on trial by the court without a jury, and from an order dismissing the complaint. For former report, see 11 N. Y. Supp. 960, mem.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

Appeal from order dismissing complaint, and from judgment entered on the order. Action to set aside an assignment for the benefit of creditors on the ground that it was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors. The assignment was incorporated in the complaint. At the trial a motion by defendants was granted dismissing the complaint for insufficient statement of a cause of acción. The contention of defendants, and the ruling of the court, were that an allegation in the complaint “that the said assignment was made in bad faith, and with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shultz v. . HoaglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Forbes v. . WallerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Tilson v. . TerwilligerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Miller v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Halsted v. HalstedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  2. Goodrich v. DormanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  3. Probert v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Kittel v. Augusta, T. & G. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  5. Garfield Nat. Bank v. PeckNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API