Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Whittenberger v. Clarke

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2000No. 99-2267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not be issued when there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. R.C. 2731.05; State ex rel. Natl. Electrical Contractors Assn., Ohio Conference v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 179, 183, 699 N.E.2d 64, 67. As the court of appeals held, Whittenberger had an adequate remedy by appeal to challenge the common pleas court’s imposition of court costs.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Galloway v. Lucas County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McGrath v. McClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Whittenberger v. ClarkeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bandy v. VillanuevaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Helfrich v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API