Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Harmon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 9, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

— Affirming.

The appellant and appellee are mother and son. In June, 1924, the husband of the appellant and father of the appellee died intestate- the owner of a farm of about 109 acres. No administration was had upon his estate, and the appellant and the appellee continued to live together until a short while before this litigation was started when they separated; the appellee and his wife removing to a small house on the premises, the appellant continuing to live in the mansion house.

In January, 1926, the appellant brought suit against her son ashing for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dupoyster v. Ft. Jefferson Imp. Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Shannon v. Stratton & TersteggeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Farmers Bank v. Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Sublett v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
  5. Center Lumber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arms v. ArmsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Wilson v. TrentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. American Oil Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API