Legal Opinion

Weisshaus v. Port Authority

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 28, 2020No. 19-161-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-161-cv Weisshaus v. Port Authority UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Aidan A. Smith v. Michael HoganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Roth v. CitiMortgage Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API