Legal Opinion

Lehigh Falls Fishing Club v. Andrejewski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, J.:

¶ 1 Lehigh Falls Fishing Club appeals the trial court’s determination that the Le-high River is a navigable waterway. 1 We affirm.

¶ 2 The underlying facts are not complicated. Appellant leases land through which the Lehigh River flows. The land is approximately ten miles north of the Francis E. Walter Dam, in Buck Township, Luzerne County. Appellant was formed in the 1960s as a fly fishing club, and it stocks the portion of the river located between its land with fish.

¶ 3 In spring 1995, John Andrejewski, Appellee, began fishing on the portion of the river located through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carson v. BlazerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
  2. Fulmer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Shrunk v. President of the Schuylkill Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
  4. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Maritime Management, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Poor v. McClureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delaware Avenue, LLC v. Department of Conservation & Natural ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Protection v. Espy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API