Legal Opinion

Yates v. . Van De Bogert

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1874PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The Mohawk and Hudson Railroad Company was authorized by its charter to acquire, by purchase, such real estate as was necessary for the construction and operation of its railroad. The lands embraced in the deed from Campbell to it will be presumed to have been acquired for this purpose. (Chautauqua County Bank v. Risley, 19 N.Y., 370; see 380.) The company acquired title in fee under that deed. When the land was no longer necessary for the purposes of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halsey v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Massachusetts v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Stewart v. . TurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API