Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Final orders entered in separate proceedings pursuant to section 696 of the Civil Practice Act, and determining that the interest of appellant — a conditional vendor — in a motor truck is subordinate to respondents, levying creditors of the conditional vendee, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. The law of Connecticut controls. (See Commercial Credit Corporation v. Carlson, 114 Conn. 514; 159 A. 352.) Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dunn v. SeidenschwarzNew York Supreme Court · 1939