Baker v. Hibbs
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wayne District Court. — Hon. H. K. Evans, Judge. Suit for the partition of certain real estate. Sarah E. Hibbs, a defendant and appellant, claimed an one-fourteenth interest in the lands against some of the other, parties plaintiff and defendant. The trial court found that Sarah E. Hibbs had no interest or share in the lands, and she appeals,—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
The issue is between Sarah E. Hibbs, a defendant on the one side, and Lucinda J. Baker (now Chapen), Martha E. Marsh, and Mary K: Gunter, plaintiffs, and Hannah Hibbs, Nora D. Lee, James Hibbs, Stephen A. Hibbs, Lloyd Hibbs, and Carl Hibbs, defendants, on the other. Sarah E. Hibbs claimed an undivided one-fourteenth interest in the lands under the will of S. A. Hibbs, deceased, which, so far as material, reads as follows:
I give and bequeath to Eliza Hibbs, my beloved wife, all my personal property, she to sell enough to pay all my debts out of said property, including my last sickness and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Moran's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Kalbach v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Olsen v. YoungermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Golladay v. KnockIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- McClain v. CapperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fulton v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Atchison v. FrancisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Brandeis v. BrandeisNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Karolusson v. PaonessaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.