Legal Opinion

Kloss v. American Indemnity Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Inasmuch as the learned trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant .the principal question, presented on this appeal is, Was there sufficient evidence to warrant submitting the case to the jury?

Plaintiff’s contentions are that defendant was negligent in four respects: (1) speed, (2) yielding the right of way, (3) control, and, (4) lookout. In his complaint he alleged that defendant was negligent in ten respects. However, he now puts forth only the four elements of negligence mentioned as the ones which under the evidence should have been submitted to the jury. Those are the items that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cawley v. La Crosse City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Reynolds v. Madison Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mertens v. Lake Shore Yellow Cab & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Crawley v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Feyrer v. DurbrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kraskey v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Plog v. ZolperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bassil v. FayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API