Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Schejbal

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1984No. Docket 67680PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. R. Peterson, J.

This is an appeal as of right from an order of the probate court terminating the parental rights of respondent-appellant. He contends that the probate court used an incorrect standard of proof and that the evidence was le*835gaily insufficient to sustain the findings of the probate court.. As to the first point, appellant argues that the probate judge erroneously terminated his rights based on a standard of the best interests of the children rather than by requiring clear and convincing evidence of his parental unfitness. The probate judge said:

"The court has found that the children are within…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. In the Matter of LaFlureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. In the Matter of Baby XMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In Re WeldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re CornetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re McIntyreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In Re SlisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In the Matter of McDuelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In Re HarmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API