Personius v. Mann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLahtinen, J.
We respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority decision which concludes there are no triable issues regarding common-law negligence. Plaintiff Hugh Personius (hereinafter plaintiff), an employee of a utility company, was summoned from his home to respond to the emergency at defendants’ premises where a building was on fire. Intent on cutting off electrical power to the burning building, plaintiff ascended a utility pole owned by defendants. The pole gave way at its base, causing plaintiff to fall and sustain severe fractures to both his wrists.
An owner of real property has a duty…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kush v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tagle v. JakobNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Weller v. Colleges of SenecasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- McGuire v. . Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.