Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Valley Telephone Co. v. Hocut

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1936No. 3338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTHALL, Justice.

This suit was brought by Mrs. Maud Hocut, individually, and as guardian of her minor child, Janice, being respectively the surviving wife and daughter of John Flocut, deceased, and Joe H. Hocut, father of John Hocut, as plaintiffs. The suit is brought against the Rio Grande Valley Telephone Company, defendant, for exemplary damages for alleged gross negligence of the defendant in causing the death of John Hocut. Plaintiffs allege that they have sustained actual damages, but, owing to the fact that at the time of the accident causing the death of John Hocut the defendant was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ShufordTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Southern Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Cutler v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Tullos v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API