Legal Opinion
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Peartree
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 17, 1976No. 752DC756PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in entering an order granting a new trial.
Plaintiff argues that under G.S. 7A-192 Judge Manning had no power to rule on defendant’s motion because he had not been authorized in writing to hear motions and enter interlocutory orders. G.S. 7A-192 provides, in relevant part:
“Any district judge may hear motions and enter interlocutory orders in causes regularly calendared for trial or for the disposition of motions, at any session to which the district judge has been assigned to preside. The chief district judge and any district judge…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brady v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carter Ex Rel. Carter v. ClowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Stroupe v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. v. Key Way Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- McKinley Building Corp. v. AlvisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Robinson v. GENERAL MILLS RESTAURANTS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.