Legal Opinion

Matejka v. Dulaney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 14, 2010No. 4D09-2382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Of the issues raised by appellants, Anne Matejka and Jean Ceccaldi, in their appeal from the final judgment for damages en tered after default, we find only the first has merit. We affirm the others without discussion.

In 1994, the parents of Anne Matejka and Vera Dulaney executed a trust of which Matejka, Dulaney and another sister are beneficiaries. In 2006, after the parents died, Dulaney filed a complaint against Matejka and her husband, Jean Ceccaldi, for a trust accounting. After Matejka and Ceccaldi abandoned their defense of the suit and moved to France, the trial court entered the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sharon P. Talbot v. Margaret A. RosenbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Lynn v. SakharoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Paul McMullen v. HSBC Bank USA, National Assoc. etc. etalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API