Clayton v. May
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. The courts of Georgia will take judicial cognizance,of the fact that the city of Columbus, Ga., is in Muscogee county; and therefore an affidavit to foreclose a chattel mortgage which alleged the residence of the defendant and the location of the goods to be in the city of Columbus, Ga„ sufficiently stated the venue.
2. One partner sold his interest in the firm to the other, and took three notes therefor. These were secured by a chattel mortgage, the condition of which was, in substance, that if the purchaser should pay the notes or should pay off the claims against the firm (stating them)…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Beatty v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Witcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952