New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co. v. Biermacher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The requests of plaintiff in error, in writing, to charge before argument, the refusal of the court to give such charge, and the language of the court in his general charge, excepted to, raise the question whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, is applicable to a case involving the liability of an employer to an employee under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Comp. St. Sections 8657-8665).
"Were this an open question we would find it difficult to distinguish the inapplicability of the doctrine to an action of a servant against a master from the applicability of the doctrine to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. KastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Brown v. L. A. Wells Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.