Legal Opinion
Formichella v. Layton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 6, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 1 (1953)
95 A.2d 419
JOSEPH FORMICHELLA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM D. LAYTON, SR. AND WILLIAM D. LAYTON, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS WILLIAM D. LAYTON & SON FUEL TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 24, 1953.
Decided March 6, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Lane, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William T. Osborne, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powers v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Powers v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Paulsen v. KlingeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Belperche v. Erie Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Kuczko v. Prudential Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pignatore v. Public Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- BURKE EX REL. BURKE v. Auto MartNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Schaublin v. LeberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- O'BRIEN v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Turner v. MartinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956