La Plant v. Pratt-Ford Greenhouse Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Anoka county, to recover $466.67 on a promissory note. The case was' tried before Giddings, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in behalf of plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action upon a promissory note for $466.67, of date June 1, 1905, alleged to have been executed and delivered by appellant to respondent. The answer admitted that appellant was a corporation created and existing under and by virtue of the laws of Minnesota, but denied the execution and delivery of the note, and alleged, on information and belief, that it was executed and delivered to respondent by one D. O. Pratt, without any authority of appellant company. Verdict returned for respondent for the full amount of the note. Upon this appeal the appellant contends that it conclusively appears from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- London & North West American Mortgage Co. v. St. Paul Park Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- First National Bank v. Compo-Board Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Moore v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Gardner v. United Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Kelly v. Southern Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Citizens State Bank v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930