Legal Opinion

Garigen v. Morrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered April 17, 2002, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the judgment to award plaintiffs postjudgment interest, costs and disbursements.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the judgment to award plaintiffs postjudgment interest, costs and disbursements. Defendant contends that plaintiffs are equitably estopped from seeking postjudgment interest because they twice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Transcontinental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Greenberg v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Michaels v. United States Tennis Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Garigen v. MorrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Nostrand v. FroehlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Triadou SPV S.A. v. CF 135 Flat LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Triadou SPV S.A. v. CF 135 Flat LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API