Legal Opinion
State v. Richards
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 26, 1972PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WERNICK, Justice.
In the District Court (Northern Andro-scoggin Division, Livermore Falls) defendant was charged with possessing barbituric acid and amphetamines (a felony in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210). Pending a hearing on probable cause, defendant moved in the Superior Court (Androscog-gin County) — pursuant to Rule 41 (e) M.R. Crim.P. — for the suppression as evidence against him of
“any ’*and all quantities of barbituric acid and/or amphetamines held in possession or under the control of the State of Maine.”
The ground was that
“if the State does in fact possess such evidence and if it…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. BoilardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- People v. DandreaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.