Legal Opinion

D'PAFFO v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2002No. 28S04-0108-CR-377PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Angelo D’Paffo was convicted of child molesting by committing deviate sexual conduct. The Court of Appeals reversed on grounds that the jury had not been instructed that the State was required to prove that Defendant acted with the intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desires. We disagree and hold that the State is not required to prove intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desires in order to obtain a conviction of child molesting by committing deviate sexual conduct.

Background

The facts most favorable to the judgment indicate that Defendant lived…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chris D. Hawkins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Douglas L. Leistner v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Jaco v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jarrard v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  5. Jeremy Benner v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API